Bluepill Case study | Immi Ramen
The Goal
01
Taste, Texture & Nutrition Trade-Off Simulation
BluePill simulated how real shoppers evaluate taste, texture, and nutrition claims simultaneously—revealing where consumers are willing to accept trade-offs and where performance expectations remain non-negotiable.
02
Claim Hierarchy & Bias Testing
Using AI consumer panels, BluePill tested how different nutrition signals (protein, fiber, sodium, sugar, ingredient order) influence preference, trust, and rejection—identifying which claims drive excitement versus hesitation.
03
Decision Logic Validation Against Human Panels
BluePill benchmarked AI-generated results against real human survey data, validating that AI personas replicated not just outcomes, but the underlying decision logic consumers use when choosing better-for-you ramen.
Time to insights.
Match to real human data
Investments.
Average Accuracy
Rank Order Alignment
Speed
Cost
Consumers value taste balance
BluePill correctly identified that taste and texture improvements offset moderate nutrition trade-offs.
Ingredient cues drive bias
Differences on “sugar listed” or “wheat flour first” showed where emotional and health associations matter most.
AI Personas mirror real decisions
BluePill accurately captured underlying consumer logic in nutrition trade-off questions.
Conclusion
BluePill helped Immi Ramen unlock faster, smarter, and cheaper consumer understanding — enabling them to iterate product strategy with confidence.
